<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br>On 20 May 2018, at 7:26 am, Mojca Miklavec <<a href="mailto:mojca@macports.org">mojca@macports.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">V ned., 20. maj 2018 00:06 je oseba Marcus Calhoun-Lopez napisala:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">There is a pull request to update Octave to 4.4.0.<br>
A significant amount of work has been put in to it.<br>
While attempting to address some of the outstanding issues, my version had diverged in some significant ways.<br>
<br>
Does anyone have any suggestions on the proper way forward?<br>
<br>
It seems inefficient to attempt to describe the changes in the current pull request comment section.<br>
It seems a little silly to open a competing pull request.<br>
Should I create a pull request on the pull request?<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">You cannot open a PR against a PR. </div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why not ? Nothing is stopping you opening a second PR against the feature branch used for the first one. PRs can be against any branch you want, not just master.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">If changes are significant, it's probably best to open a new one and just mention in description that it was inspired by <link>.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Mojca</div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>