<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">><i class=""> I did not want to touch that at this point. The gcc bug report is still
</i>><i class=""> open, as far as I can see.
</i>><i class="">
</i>><i class=""> If someone wants try a build using —with-build-sysroot instead, they are
</i>><i class=""> very welcome to try...
</i>><i class="">
</i>><i class=""> Cheers chris
</i>><i class="">
</i>
Chris,
I'll try your changes with that hunk removed. I don't see why it
shouldn't bootstrap with only that patch applied as the xgcc and final gcc
should now all look via xcrun for the SDK location.
Jack
</pre></blockquote><div class=""><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class=""></pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class=""></pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">If I might ask for a little testing on all the systems we support before we do that. </pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Although I have been pushing the SDKROOT business for a while now, for all recent systems, we have no idea yet how this might affect bootstrapping all the older systems we support.</pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">I’d hate to have to go back and just put this all back in again :></pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class=""></pre><pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Ken</pre></div></body></html>