<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">To clarify - this was in the context of commits to base/ <div><br></div><div>(That may or may not change your perception - but like I said, I didn’t measure and this is totally measurable). </div><div><div dir="ltr">-- <div>Daniel J. Luke</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Nov 5, 2023, at 1:26 PM, Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/4/23 02:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:43D3A51D-9443-4F33-B912-DE6DFF044835@geeklair.net"><span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">(Before we moved to github there were many people saying we'd get lots more commits by moving to it, but the volume doesn't seem much higher to me - of course, I also didn't measure before/after so my perception could be incorrect).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I think that's very, very wrong. There are vastly, vastly more
community submitted updates now, and they are easy to apply to the
repository with low effort on the part of the macports committers.
It's been an unequivocal win.</p>
<p>Perry</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>