[MacPorts] #39807: wxWidgets: allow side-by-side installation of 2.8 and 2.9
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Aug 1 08:44:21 PDT 2013
#39807: wxWidgets: allow side-by-side installation of 2.8 and 2.9
----------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: jwa@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: wxWidgets wxWidgets-devel wxWidgets30 |
----------------------------------------------------+-------------------
Comment (by mojca@…):
I now tried to add
{{{
--datadir=${prefix}/share/${distname}/${version}
}}}
and the files end up in
{{{
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/aclocal/wxwin.m4
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/bakefile/presets/wx.bkl
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/bakefile/presets/wx_presets.py
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/bakefile/presets/wx_unix.bkl
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/bakefile/presets/wx_win32.bkl
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/bakefile/presets/wx_xrc.bkl
/opt/local/share/wxWidgets/2.9.5/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/wxstd.mo
}}}
Given that the locale is only present in 2.9, one could probably add
{{{
--localedir=${prefix}/share/locale
}}}
and possibly install those files with port_select but that's debatable and
less important given that almost no-one missed the localisation in 2.8.
Debian installs localisation files as a separate package and maybe that's
a way to go anyway, it's just that it's less important than the rest at
the moment.
I'm more worried about the remaining {{{aclocal}}} and {{{bakefile}}}s. At
least gnuplot compiles without any of these; I'm not yet sure about the
rest of ports.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39807#comment:4>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list