<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><a href="https://www.corecode.io/macupdater/" class="">MacUpdater</a> will in a future release (probably after the very next) add excluding /Applications/MacPorts from its search for apps in need of updating, since I requested that and they're quite responsive. That should prevent people from accidentally using it to update some app bundle that was installed by (and should be updated via!) MacPorts.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">They mentioned that Homebrew is a source of information (among others) to them for available updates, and apparently vice versa in some cases, apparently to the benefit of both (I'm paraphrasing, since I didn't ask for permission to quote).</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">That got me to wondering if there's a way to get the equivalent of "port list all", all on one page, over the web; for someone that might not want to</div><div class="">install MacPorts, but wanted to see what its current versions of all its packages were (and perhaps even generate feedback on availability of newer</div><div class="">packages), that might be useful.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I can get that on <a href="https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=all" class="">https://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=all</a> but that's not all on one page, and it has a lot of other stuff that makes it more difficult</div><div class="">to consume as machine-readable.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">FWIW, I just heard about MacUpdater from a Friday <a href="http://MacRumors.com" class="">MacRumors.com</a> <a href="https://www.macrumors.com/2019/08/02/five-mac-apps-august-2019/" class="">article</a>. From a few hours use, it seems to find more and be less quirky than</div><div class="">the far better known MacUpdate Desktop, and it's a lower one-time price rather than a subscription. So if there are any other easy things they might</div><div class="">be willing to do to better accommodate MacPorts (but probably not generating a terminal session to run "port update...", it might be interesting. Although right now, I gather that since they didn't realize that MacPorts was still so active (because they saw very few people with /Applications/MacPorts, I guess), there aren't yet many people that use both.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>