Need a referee - BUG or RFE?

[Daniel J. Luke]

On Oct 4, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Mark Duling wrote:
> Can I get a vote on whether the snippet below from bug 10226  
> represents a
> feature request or a bug?  Being the bug Nazi is a thankless job.  :)

It's probably a bug.

But it might not be as serious as the reporter says.

Port info, the portIndex and the portfile's gnupg version number  
don't have anything to do with what version port thinks is installed.

Also, it's possible that gnupg 1.4.5 was installed, but not activated  
(but there's not enough information in the bug report to determine  
this).

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20061004/647bdfbc/PGP.bin