Website redesign (was Re: Please clear up DarwinPort/MacPorts confusion)

[Juan Manuel Palacios]

	Replying quickly to just a single comment, as I haven't been able to 
keep up with the thread lately:

On Apr 11, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>
> I'd say this list is fine. There's only the dev and the users list.
>

	Actually I'd like to move this discussion to the dev list entirely. 
First off, the discussion is currently split between the two lists 
(which I realize is my fault to begin with for having cross-posted when 
I began the thread), so concentrating it on a single one is a good 
thing. But other than the users list being of higher volume and 
messages tend to get lost easily (which I know it's something I can fix 
locally with a good mail client ;-), I believe this thread pertains 
more to the development of the project than to user support, which is 
what users@ is for. I think we can all agree that the people we want 
involved in our documentation should at least have some notions of 
programming/MacPorts development, at least enough to know there's a 
dev@ mailing list and to want to subscribe to it ;-) Signal to noise 
ratio on users@ is lower, I believe.

	So lets keep it on dev@, please.


-jmpp