[23968] trunk/base

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Apr 14, 2007, at 22:41, Paul Guyot wrote:

>> So, these changes you're making... are they the solution to the  
>> problem I reported when I want to define my own universal variant?  
>> Should I be (as soon as released MacPorts supports it) using  
>> "universal_variant no" before defining my own universal variant?
>
> No. You just define your own universal variant with:
>
> variant universal {
> 	# Your code goes here.
> }

Ok, that's what I'm doing (in sleepwatcher), but it's resulting in  
weirdness: "port info" shows two "universal" variants; see:


$ port info sleepwatcher | head -n 1
sleepwatcher 2.0.4, Revision 2, sysutils/sleepwatcher (Variants:  
universal, server, universal)


(This is with my ports tree indexed by portindex from macports trunk  
as of a few moments ago.)