[22007] portutil.tcl mods / more portfile.7 changes needed?
Jordan K. Hubbard
jkh at brierdr.com
Wed Feb 14 07:39:49 PST 2007
You'd have to have a separate mode flag that would apply just to
directories. A permission of 0755, for example, would be perfectly
valid for an entire hierarchy of directories.
- Jordan
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> I will point out that if xinstall copies directories, that raises
> the question of how to apply mode and owner/groups to the installed
> directories. owner/group should be safe to recurse, but mode
> wouldn't be.
>
> On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
>> On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>>
>>> xinstall and file copy are different - xinstall is implemented in
>>> pextlib, and apparently doesn't recursively copy directories.
>>> It's a shame.
>>>
>>> So yeah, while xinstall won't handle directories, copy will do it
>>> just fine. The difference is that copy won't handle file
>>> permissions, but xinstall does.
>>
>> I was trying to copy the semantics of install(1) in order to obey
>> what seemed to be the principle of least astonishment. That
>> said, I'm having a hard time thinking of just how and where the
>> world would end if someone were to enhance it to actually copy
>> directories. I was probably being too conservative.
>
> --
> Kevin Ballard
> http://kevin.sb.org
> eridius at macports.org
> http://www.tildesoft.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070214/0eb7fce3/attachment.html
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list