[22092] trunk/dports/python
Yves de Champlain
yves at macports.org
Sun Feb 18 08:47:55 PST 2007
Le 07-02-17 à 14:15, Blair Zajac a écrit :
> Yves de Champlain wrote:
>> Le 07-02-17 à 11:32, Yves de Champlain a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le 07-02-17 à 11:18, source_changes at macosforge.org
>>> <mailto:source_changes at macosforge.org> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Revision
>>>> 22092 <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/
>>>> changeset/22092>
>>>> Author
>>>> mww at macports.org <mailto:mww at macports.org>
>>>> Date
>>>> 2007-02-17 08:18:26 -0800 (Sat, 17 Feb 2007)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Log Message
>>>>
>>>> new port py25-bz2 - python 2.5 bindings to bzip2
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused. Python 2.5 is presented as current
>>> production version on python.org, but these commits make it look
>>> like a special case. Is there some sort of problem with python
>>> 2.5 on Mac ? Or is this a problem with how python is managed in
>>> MacPorts ?
>> Just let me be a little more precise : could there be py24-* and
>> py25-* ports for python ports that use a specific PortGroup and py-
>> * ports for python packages that don't use a PortGroup ?
>
> But wouldn't that require the Python builds to have a common shared
> place to look for non-binary modules, so we only have to depend
> upon one port. Also, non-binary modules that depends upon binary
> modules would still need to be versioned for each version of
> Python, I think :)
Yes, that is part of the question.
I maintain a few python ports (gtk2, gobject and cairo) while not
being really proficient with python setup and configuration.
But these ports don't belong to a portgroup but rather look for
python through a configure script and will accept both 2.4 and 2.5,
so should I still make py25 versions of them ?
yves
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list