[22092] trunk/dports/python

Yves de Champlain yves at macports.org
Sun Feb 18 08:47:55 PST 2007


Le 07-02-17 à 14:15, Blair Zajac a écrit :

> Yves de Champlain wrote:
>> Le 07-02-17 à 11:32, Yves de Champlain a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le 07-02-17 à 11:18, source_changes at macosforge.org  
>>> <mailto:source_changes at macosforge.org> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Revision
>>>>     22092 <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ 
>>>> changeset/22092>
>>>> Author
>>>>     mww at macports.org <mailto:mww at macports.org>
>>>> Date
>>>>     2007-02-17 08:18:26 -0800 (Sat, 17 Feb 2007)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       Log Message
>>>>
>>>> new port py25-bz2 - python 2.5 bindings to bzip2
>>>
>>> I am a bit confused.  Python 2.5 is presented as current  
>>> production version on python.org, but these commits make it look  
>>> like a special case.  Is there some sort of problem with python  
>>> 2.5 on Mac ?  Or is this a problem with how python is managed in  
>>> MacPorts ?
>> Just let me be a little more precise : could there be py24-* and  
>> py25-* ports for python ports that use a specific PortGroup and py- 
>> * ports for python packages that don't use a PortGroup ?
>
> But wouldn't that require the Python builds to have a common shared  
> place to look for non-binary modules, so we only have to depend  
> upon one port.  Also, non-binary modules that depends upon binary  
> modules would still need to be versioned for each version of  
> Python, I think :)

Yes, that is part of the question.

I maintain a few python ports (gtk2, gobject and cairo) while not  
being really proficient with python setup and configuration.

But these ports don't belong to a portgroup but rather look for  
python through a configure script and will accept both 2.4 and 2.5,  
so should I still make py25 versions of them ?

yves




More information about the macports-dev mailing list