Default +universal variant for configure-based ports

Kevin Ballard eridius at macports.org
Tue Feb 27 11:49:49 PST 2007


Oh wow, you're right. I guess I should have checked. I guess I made  
some faulty assumptions of how portindex worked.

That said, I don't think it *should* list universal unless the port  
is actually known to work with it. Any proposed solutions?

On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

> On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
>> Incidentally, ports will not actually list +universal as a  
>> supported variant, since PortIndex won't see it.
>
> Actually, they do:
>
> % port info apr | grep universal
> apr 1.2.8, devel/apr (Variants: universal, darwin_9)
> % port cat apr | grep universal

-- 
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.org
eridius at macports.org
http://www.tildesoft.com


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070227/410cca20/attachment.html


More information about the macports-dev mailing list