Default +universal variant for configure-based ports

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Feb 27, 2007, at 13:25, David MacMahon wrote:

> On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:20 , Kevin Ballard wrote:
>> I'm still trying to figure out why everybody keeps suggesting to  
>> pass -g. Even if autoconf does it by default (which I don't think  
>> it should), that doesn't mean we should.
>
> I think the idea is that if you build without -g then when things  
> go boom you have no (or very little) info about where things went  
> boom.  Plus, the extra debugging info can always be removed post- 
> build but it can't be inserted post-build.

How can the debugging info be removed?