svn:eol-style property

Kevin Ballard eridius at
Thu Jan 25 14:38:35 PST 2007

I'm personally fond of just patch-<filename>. The .diff seems  
redundant, what with the patch- already there.

On Jan 25, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> On Jan 25, 2007, at 02:26, Randall Wood wrote:
>> I have seen no standard that states how patch files are to be named
> I have:
> "The standard convention is to name the patch file 'patch- 
> <filename>.diff, with one diff file per file altered in the source.  
> If the filename is ambiguous because there are multiple files with  
> that name in the distribution, supply the path components to  
> uniquely identify the file being patched."
> I have been following this standard.

Kevin Ballard
eridius at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the macports-dev mailing list