perl or net category? - was variables and external cmds /
${perl5.lib}
Randall Wood
rhwood at mac.com
Sun Jan 28 17:25:21 PST 2007
On 28 Jan 2007, at 19:12, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Mark Duling wrote:
>> Ok, it works. Adding the 'PortGroup perl5 1.0' statement to my port
>> allowed me to use the variable ${perl5.archlib}, just what I
>> wanted. The
>> only remaiing question is when I add the perl portgroup to the
>> smokeping
>> port, whether I should move the port to category dports/perl or
>> leave it
>> in dports/net with perl as a secondary category.
>
> I don't think it matters if you use the group code in a non perl
> category.
>
> Its probably best if you (as the maintainer) decide which
> categories the port belongs to.
I personally feel that the language-specific groups (java, perl,
python, etc) only really make sense as the primary group for bindings
or extension to the language. If you have a network application/tool
then I'd put it in the net group.
> --
> Daniel J. Luke
> +========================================================+
> | *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
> | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
> +========================================================+
> | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily |
> | reflect the opinions of my employer. |
> +========================================================+
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
Randall Wood
rhwood at mac.com
"The rules are simple: The ball is round. The game lasts 90 minutes.
All the
rest is just philosophy."
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list