[27033] trunk/dports/textproc/chmlib/Portfile

[markd at macports.org]

Mark Grimes <mgrimes at macports.org> on Sunday, July 15, 2007 at 10:50 PM
-0800 wrote:
>I suppose not, I just figured people whom are installing it as a 
>conduit to another app or a library for their own applications would 
>not want 6 additional binaries hanging out in /opt/local/bin.
>
>I'll happily roll it in if you'd prefer, it does have some end user 
>functionality benefits obviously.

No preference, I just thought it worth asking.  Use your own judgement. 
Sorry for being nosy, I didn't realize there were binaries involved.

Mark