lynx port

Daniel J.Luke dluke at geeklair.net
Fri Mar 30 08:29:52 PDT 2007


On Mar 30, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> yep, I was going to suggest that we patch lynx this way to fix it.
>
> I can generate a patch and check it in (since it's a nomaintainer  
> port) unless someone else wants to.

Patch checked in in r23382.

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070330/33d02c0d/PGP.bin


More information about the macports-dev mailing list