[24922] trunk/dports/PortIndex

[Daniel J. Luke]

On May 8, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Two of those actually are bad, two of them actually are good.
>>
>> The two good ones have plusses in them (and I thought we weren't  
>> going to have plusses in port names?)
>
> Well, we got 'em now. Now what? Do we rename the two ports or  
> expand the regex?

I vote for renaming the ports.

Having them there makes it harder to search for them with port search  
(since that's regex based).

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20070508/dc08acb7/PGP.bin