[31521] trunk/base/Mk/macports.autoconf.mk.in
Anders F Björklund
afb at macports.org
Tue Nov 27 01:49:48 PST 2007
Boey Maun Suang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Probably a stupid question, but:
>
>> LDFLAGS = -L/usr/local/lib @LDFLAGS@
>
> Should we really have '-L/usr/local/lib' in that line in
> trunk/base/Mk/macports.autoconf.mk.in ?
Having it there (explicitly) makes things more predictable,
as it'll look in /usr/local for *both* headers and libraries.
see http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/changeset/18978
(notorious to break are the "readline" and "iconv" libraries)
But maybe it should also be accompanied by a similar such explicit
-I/usr/local/include flag to CPPFLAGS, to make things "consistent".
GCC will look into /usr/local/include anyway (and /usr/include too),
but restating it again might make it more self-documenting ? Or not.
--anders
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list