Split Trunk

[Michael Wild]

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
 >
 > Half of our portfiles (2139 of 4300) are currently unmaintained. Even
 > ports that are maintained are not necessarily working properly. How
 > could we in good conscience even declare that the current port
 > collection is "stable"? How would dividing our efforts between stable
 > and unstable branches help us to improve our ports collection faster
 > than we do now?
 >
[snip]

I'd gladly volunteer to take some. I think that it would make sense to 
assign the ports by priority: Important ones first. However, as I'm 
relatively new to MacPorts I don't know which ports are considered to be 
important (or very popular). Any suggestions? How would I go about 
"adopting" an unmaintained port?


Michael