Split Trunk

[Daniel J. Luke]

> Yeah, a regular user should only see the need for using a single  
> tree, the one we would serve up by default ("release"), unless very  
> specific needs drove him/her some secondary tree for whatever  
> reason (e.g., a MacPorts developers wanting to test with real life  
> Portfiles a new feature that hasn't been released ;-)

There's nothing that stops macports developers from having their own  
trees where they test new features that they're working on.

Having another port tree in the repo doesn't help us get more testing  
if we're not pushing users to it somehow (and I don't know how that  
would work since we'd also be pushing them to run on pre-release base/)

--
Daniel J. Luke
+========================================================+
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |
+========================================================+
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |
+========================================================+


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20071005/3072835d/PGP.bin