[29842] trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile

[Ryan Schmidt]

I suppose that wouldn't be a bad idea. But we should first arrange it  
so that "port search pgp" reveals the gnupg ports that we recommend  
instead.

On Oct 12, 2007, at 03:23, Randall Wood wrote:

> Is there any reason not to simply remove this port from the tree?
>
> On 12 Oct 2007, at 02:59, source_changes at macosforge.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 29842
>>           http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/ 
>> 29842
>> Author:   ryandesign at macports.org
>> Date:     2007-10-11 23:59:29 -0700 (Thu, 11 Oct 2007)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> pgp: add a note that users probably don't want this software
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>>     trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile	2007-10-11 23:35:49 UTC (rev  
>> 29841)
>> +++ trunk/dports/mail/pgp5/Portfile	2007-10-12 06:59:29 UTC (rev  
>> 29842)
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>  	PGP 5.0 contains support for new encryption methods (most notably \
>>  	DSS/Diffie-Hellman), and built-in keyserver support.  Also, the \
>>  	command line has been redesigned to be more Unix and scripting \
>> -	friendly.
>> +	friendly. Note: this software is old; you probably want gnupg or \
>> +	gnupg2 instead.
>>
>>  patchfiles	pgpFullLicense.c-patch