[30293] trunk/dports/lang/clisp

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Oct 23, 2007, at 18:45, source_changes at macosforge.org wrote:

> Revision: 30293
>           http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/30293
> Author:   eridius at macports.org
> Date:     2007-10-23 16:45:28 -0700 (Tue, 23 Oct 2007)
>
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Update clisp 2.42, and at the same time make significant changes so  
> this will actually build under Leopard
>
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>     trunk/dports/lang/clisp/Portfile
>
> Removed Paths:
> -------------
>     trunk/dports/lang/clisp/files/
>
> Modified: trunk/dports/lang/clisp/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/lang/clisp/Portfile	2007-10-23 22:46:03 UTC (rev  
> 30292)
> +++ trunk/dports/lang/clisp/Portfile	2007-10-23 23:45:28 UTC (rev  
> 30293)
> @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
>  # $Id$
>
>  PortSystem 1.0
> +
>  name		clisp
> -version		2.40
> +version		2.42
>  categories	lang
> -maintainers	nomaintainer
> +maintainers	eridius openmaintainer
>  platforms	darwin
>  description	The Clisp Common Lisp Implementation
>  long_description	\
> @@ -21,9 +22,9 @@
>  homepage	http://clisp.cons.org/
>  master_sites	gnu:clisp/release/${version}	\
>  		sourceforge
> -checksums	sha1 4e64b3d04c91b16bc2626f5d89938dbcd4d71a56
> +checksums       md5 3fc28342e446a62c1eb4f65277929888 \
> +                sha1 4c39a5549d2821b1d5ab1cfca172527e9053af1c
>  use_bzip2	yes
> -patchfiles	patch-documentation.lisp
>
>  depends_lib	port:readline	\
>  		port:gettext	\
> @@ -41,82 +42,74 @@
>  		}
>  		
>  platform darwin 6 {
> -		ui_msg "clisp is not supported on Jaguar (OS X 10.2.x)"
> -		exit 1
> +		throw UNSUPPORTED "clisp is not supported on Jaguar (OS X 10.2.x)"
>  		}

[snip]

Hm! I've never seen "throw" in a portfile before. Interesting. Seems  
to work though. (I made a minor fix in r30386). Is "throw" how we  
should be handling unsupported platforms? What else should we be  
throwing, instead of 'return -code error "message"' which is what I  
thought was recommended before?