[33790] trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
Brett Eisenberg
brett at macports.org
Tue Feb 5 09:54:57 PST 2008
That's what I thought, from the guide, but went with what lint told me
at the time :(
Happy to add them back in once someone decides on a standard.
b
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2008, at 07:40, brett at macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 33790
>> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/33790
>> Author: brett at macports.org
>> Date: 2008-02-05 05:40:09 -0800 (Tue, 05 Feb 2008)
>>
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> linted
>>
>> Modified Paths:
>> --------------
>> trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
>>
>> Modified: trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:28:15 UTC (rev
>> 33789)
>> +++ trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:40:09 UTC (rev
>> 33790)
>> @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
>> -# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode:
>> nil; \
>> -# c-basic-offset: 4 -*-
>> vim:fenc=utf-8:filetype=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
>> # $Id$
>
> [snip]
>
> Actually, we are trying to *add* modelines to portfiles, not remove
> them, though I wish we would standardize on a single modeline and
> not just whatever someone feels like using.
>
>
> "port lint" in MacPorts 1.6.0 is broken in its check for modelines.
> This was fixed in trunk already:
>
> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13496
>
>
>
>
>
> !DSPAM:47a8a27a618281433542597!
>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list