2-architecture +universal variants please (was: Re: [32999] trunk/base/ChangeLog)

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Jan 17, 2008, at 01:44, Anders F Björklund wrote:

>> It's OK to build 64-bit universals if desired, but it should not  
>> be the default and it should be configurable - and if it builds 32- 
>> bit binaries without +universal, it should build with it too.
>
> Also, it would be more "universal" if it was to use the 10.4u SDK  
> on Leopard too, since then the generated binaries would work on  
> Tiger in addition. (currently it uses the 10.5 SDK if available)

Yes, but I understood that it was changed to use the 10.5 SDK on  
Leopard because using the 10.4u SDK on Leopard was broken?