Ticket resolved status
raimue at macports.org
Tue Jul 8 17:21:25 PDT 2008
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> If I had to define these I guess I would say:
> fixed - there was a problem in MacPorts and it was fixed in MacPorts
Or: there was a problem somewhere and this fix is available through MacPorts
Some problems are directed to upstream and fixed there, and then an
updated Portfile provides the fix.
> invalid - not a MacPorts issue?
> wontfix - there is a problem in MacPorts and it will not be fixed in
> duplicate - another ticket describes this problem
> worksforme - unable to reproduce the issue, user did not provide
> sufficient information
You definitions sound good. Is there an appropriate place in the guide
to add them?
> How would you resolve this ticket? "fixed" because the user fixed the
> problem? "invalid" because it's not a MacPorts problem? "wontfix"
> because we won't change anything in MacPorts to fix it? "worksforme"
> because it works for me (when I don't mis-configure my
> macports.conf)? Do you see my problem? :-)
I would say user error is 'invalid'. It was an invalid claim that there
is a bug.
More information about the macports-dev