[35275] trunk/dports

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Mar 24, 2008, at 09:05, James Berry wrote:

> Yes, as Adam says, this is our standard and supported behavior, and  
> is used for many ports. I'm not sure it's documented anywhere  
> however, but Adam's explanation is correct; we support two forms of  
> obfuscation, a specific one for the macports.org case, and a more  
> general variety for any email address. The rationale is to cut down  
> on the possibility of spam to committers, though this is only one  
> leak of email addresses, and there are others that remain unfixed  
> (bug reports, irc logs, etc).

The $Id$ tag at the top of every portfile. :(