[35275] trunk/dports

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Mar 24, 2008, at 19:00, Rainer Müller wrote:

> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Mar 24, 2008, at 09:05, James Berry wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, as Adam says, this is our standard and supported behavior, and
>>> is used for many ports. I'm not sure it's documented anywhere
>>> however, but Adam's explanation is correct; we support two forms of
>>> obfuscation, a specific one for the macports.org case, and a more
>>> general variety for any email address. The rationale is to cut down
>>> on the possibility of spam to committers, though this is only one
>>> leak of email addresses, and there are others that remain unfixed
>>> (bug reports, irc logs, etc).
>>
>> The $Id$ tag at the top of every portfile. :(
>
> Uh, you are so right. I never thought about that, but this really  
> makes
> obfuscation rather useless for committers...

Well, we had to start somewhere. We started with the maintainer line  
in the portfiles. Next, we need a solution for obfuscating the $Id$  
line and trac tickets (use obfuscated Trac/svn logins?)