port doesn't exit with proper return value

nox n.oxyde at gmail.com
Sat May 17 03:02:27 PDT 2008

Le 17 mai 08 à 08:56, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :

> I suppose I can see the point if you've asked for the installation of
> various unrelated ports, that it should continue to install the other
> ports even if one fails. But it seems like "most" people would want
> MacPorts to stop and issue and error if an error occurs. The other
> behavior could be available via a flag, for advanced users.

We should remove "-x" then, as "-p" already exists:
-p       Despite any errors encountered, proceed to process multiple  
ports and commands.


More information about the macports-dev mailing list