volatile variants (was Re: Gimp 2.6 & Pango 1.8 : no font rendering)
Jeremy Huddleston
jeremyhu at macports.org
Tue Apr 14 16:49:23 PDT 2009
I think it might be wise to create a list of such volatile variants
(system_x11, universal, no_x11, etc) and mention them to users in the
install guide, so they can make decisions about them before it's too
late.
Also, this brings up a point that has been bothering me for a while.
Why do we have so many variants for what should really be a single
binary decision: +x11, +no_x11, +quartz, +no_quartz, +aqua
On Apr 14, 2009, at 16:16, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 22:45, David Evans wrote:
>
>> I suspect that a number of the reports of GOffice and other apps
>> not working correctly no_x11/quartz is due to the same problem of
>> mixing X11
>> and no_x11 in the same instance of MacPorts -- not realistic to
>> think that you can do this and have the right selection of ports/
>> variants
>> active at any given point in time.
>
> Probably true. The other point is that some users may not be
> intending to mix and match, yet may not realize that by the time
> they choose to use quartz and no_x11 they may already have ports
> installed for which that choice should have been made. Hence, the
> recommendation is that you must make the choice to use quartz and
> no_x11 before you have installed any ports, and if you have
> installed any ports, you should remove them, then set the default
> variants, or else as David said, install a new MacPorts to a new
> prefix where you set the default variants and then install your ports.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-users mailing list
> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list