A PortGroup for building more 32/64-bit universal packages

[Jordan K. Hubbard]

Another interesting point about the default universal arches is that  
today, they're set to "i386 ppc" whereas "the future" would tend to  
suggest that "i386 x86_64" will be a better choice, so at some point  
the defaults are also going to have to change.  Is this a knob that we  
currently support setting on a site-specific basis?

- Jordan

On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote:

> I have a need of more 32/64-bit universal packages.
> To facilitate this, I would like to propose a PortGroup with a  
> different
> universal build mechanism than the default.
> See http://trac.macports.org/ticket/17972.
>
> It is intended to be an improvement of the merge function.
>
> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> The only time I write in Tcl is on MacPorts related projects.
>
> -Marcus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev