Forcing a variant to a variant

[Rainer Müller]

On 2009-06-05 01:22, Scott Haneda wrote:
> A few of those are done already.  Is closing #126 just a matter of  
> splitting the above ports into two, and having on depend on the other  
> with a startup item in it?  That ticket is 7 years old, if the list  
> above is all it takes to close it, maybe I can find a weekend

No, splitting those ports is a workaround which is applicable in the
+server case. But it is on no means a solution for #126.

Rainer