p5-image-exiftool

[Ryan Schmidt]

To clarify, the fact that "port lint" has something to say doesn't  
automatically mean there's a bug in the portfile. It could instead  
mean there is a bug in lint.

In this case, however, lint is right and something should be done to  
the port. The least intrusive thing to do is to move the port to the  
correct directory, and keep the port name as it is.

DPORTS=http://svn.macosforge.org/repository/macports/trunk/dports
svn mv $DPORTS/{graphics/exiftool,perl/p5-image-exiftool}


On Mar 6, 2009, at 21:48, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

> port lint --nitpick p5-image-exiftool
> --->  Verifying Portfile for p5-image-exiftool
> Warning: Line 5 should be a newline (after PortGroup)
> Error: Portfile parent directory graphics does not match primary  
> category perl
> Error: Portfile directory exiftool does not match port name p5- 
> image-exiftool
> --->  2 errors and 1 warnings found.
>
> So that'd be a bug.
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
>> There's somthing strange:
>>
>> $ port cat p5-image-exiftool
>> # $Id: Portfile 38454 2008-07-21 13:51:06Z blair at macports.org $
>>
>> PortSystem          1.0
>> PortGroup           perl5 1.0
>> perl5.setup         Image-ExifTool 7.37
>> maintainers         blair openmaintainer
>> description         Perl interface to EXIF metadata
>> long_description    ${description}
>>
>> platforms           darwin
>>
>> checksums           md5 9e214b3eba4ae3f1eadc4370da6cad70
>>
>> homepage            http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/
>> master_sites        ${homepage}
>>
>> depends_lib         port:p5-digest-md5 \
>>                    port:p5-compress-zlib
>>
>> but this port is in graphics/exiftool! This is really misleading.
>> Is this a bug?