[47804] trunk/dports/devel/cmake/Portfile

[Orville Bennett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mar 7, 2009, at 5:50 PM, cssdev at mac.com wrote:

> On Mar 7, 2009, at 4:11 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Mar 6, 2009, at 15:49, toby at macports.org wrote:
>>
>>> Revision: 47804
>>>         http://trac.macports.org/changeset/47804
>>> Author:   toby at macports.org
>>> Date:     2009-03-06 13:49:15 -0800 (Fri, 06 Mar 2009)
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> cmake 2.6.3
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Did the maintainer approve this update, or was there a ticket filed  
>> to which the maintainer did not respond within 72 hours?
I was about to say this change was fine by me, but then realized: I'm  
not the maintainer!
Ha.
*ahem*
I'll go back to my room now.
>
> Neither. I've been checking some other build issues with CMake, but  
> I would prefer that we follow the procedure of creating tickets,  
> assigning them to maintainers, and referencing them in commit  
> messages.
>
> Could we enable the Trac pre-commit-hook[1] that requires commit  
> messages to reference open tickets? There have been a number of  
> recent commits to ports without references to tickets, and that  
> makes it hard to dig through Trac to find the background info for a  
> particular commit. That's annoying for ports I maintain, especially  
> without either any contact with me or tickets filed in Trac. (There  
> have been some timeouts too, but that's part of the process. :)
>
> I think we should require port commits to reference existing, open  
> Trac tickets.
>
> Chris
>
> [1]: http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/contrib/trac-pre-commit-hook
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmzGo0ACgkQ2yWVgjgEOKQcnQCglCsRXnet66Vi0y/WKD61jCZ3
0lQAoKUeJ6/3ss00gN5tcR3VtbGgjvFn
=lV5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----