Openssl: built-in or ports?
Jeremy Lavergne
jeremy at lavergne.gotdns.org
Tue Mar 31 07:20:42 PDT 2009
Presently, MacPorts doesn't distribute binaries.
> Using the MacPorts version of OpenSSL has a licensing problem with
> GPL ports, though... When distributing package binaries, that is.
>
> Like http://www.finkproject.org/doc/packaging/policy.php?phpLang=en#openssl
> http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 (using system openssl
> is ok)
>
>> Go with the MacPorts version of openssl: MacPorts is meant to be
>> entirely self-contained.
>>
>>> My question is: is it okay for me to specify the port to use the
>>> built-in openssl, or is it better to make the port depend on the
>>> openssl from ports?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2435 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20090331/c61fd617/attachment.bin>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list