py26-numpy, py26-scipy, and macports atlas/lapack/blas

[James Kyle]

I'm going ahead with the changes. They should be live in an hour.

-james
On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 09:57:25PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Oct 4, 2009, at 20:10, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 07:50:16PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Oct 4, 2009, at 17:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Last I checked gcc42 still wouldn't build, but perhaps r57804  
>>>>> fixed
>>>>> that. I will try again now.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, gcc42 still doesn't build for me and at least one other  
>>>> person on
>>>> Snow Leopard; see:
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21665
>>>
>>> It shouldn't come as a surprise as the patches I submitted for
>>> FSF gcc only went into gcc trunk for gcc 4.4 and later...
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00333.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00428.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg00811.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01515.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01532.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00054.html
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg00177.html
>>
>> I suggested in my previous message that perhaps your patches had not
>> been used by MacPorts, since you already said your patches do not  
>> work
>> for gcc43, yet gcc43 was modified to work on Snow Leopard.
>>
>
> I didn't say that gcc 4.2 couldn't be made to work but that
> there wasn't much point of doing so (outside of pdftk which
> is broken because it incorrectly mixes c++ and java exceptions
> which is no longer permitted in FSF gcc).
>>
>>> Considering that gcc 4.2.x is currently depreciated and
>>> unmaintained by upstream, it is rather pointless to keep
>>> it when gcc44 works as well across all architectures.
>>> The only reason Apple is stuck at 4.2.1 is because of
>>> the GPLv3 licensing issues.
>>
>> My motivation for gcc42 at this moment is pdftk which does not  
>> compile
>> with greater than gcc42.
>>
>> There are some patches for pdftk from other distributions, though, of
>> which I have just been made aware, which are supposed to help with  
>> this,
>> which I will attempt to look into and incorporate.
>>
>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/15420
>>
>
> Yes, the Gentoo patches are more promising than what Fedora uses  
> (which
> requires an openjdk package).
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev