darwin may lose primary target status on FSF gcc

[Eric Hall]

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 07:38:15PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>   There is hope! We have an analysis of the exact
> breakage in eh under 10.6 for gcc trunk...
> 
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025908.html
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025909.html
> 
> The breakage in gcc trunk is due to the additional epilog unwind
> information which darwin's unwinder (which is always used under
> 10.6 since symbols in libgcc-10.5 always come from libSystem)
> doesn't understand. The possible fixes are either to 1) not add
> the additional epilog unwind information on darwin or 2) have
> the gcc driver on darwin implicitly pass -no_compact_unwind to
> the link line. Cheers.
>            Jack


	Did someone care somewhere in here?