darwin may lose primary target status on FSF gcc

[Olivier Le Floch]

> 	Is there a reason there's ongoing discussion of
> gcc 4.x on a macports related list instead of on a gcc
> list?

Seing as there are numerous math-related ports that depend on gcc- 
related ports, I'd think raising this issue on this mailing list is  
*particularly* adequate — raising it in 3 successive separate mails  
might not be optimal, though ;)

FWIW, as the octave maintainer, it would seem to me that understanding  
the options that we'll have in the future for fortran code compilation  
is quite important, and the discussion between Toby and Jack seems  
interesting to me.