darwin may lose primary target status on FSF gcc
Jack Howarth
howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu
Tue Sep 22 15:08:24 PDT 2009
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 03:02:00PM -0700, Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 14:43, Brian Barnes <bcbarnes at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The llvm/clang community appears to have nobody / very few people interested
> > in implementing a Fortran front-end
>
> Only one way to change that...
Toby,
I suspect a careful review of the gfortran progress will show
that it only gained traction when programmers contracted to improve
it came on board. Expecting a 'grass-roots' fortran project to
viable is a bit unrealistic. Only if FSF gcc became unbuildable
on darwin might a company feel the need to expend funds on such
a project.
Jack
>
> - Toby
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list