darwin may lose primary target status on FSF gcc
howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu
Tue Sep 22 16:04:20 PDT 2009
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:00:31PM -0700, Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:53, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 05:44:59PM -0500, Brian Barnes wrote:
> >> Or, perhaps let's hope that people exist with motive, means and
> >> opportunity to contribute to gcc and keep it working on OS X, and are
> >> able to do so. I would rather not lose future updates to the only fast,
> >> free Fortran compiler on OS X. I cannot comprehend why you wish for some
> >> of us to lose our tools with no fast, free replacement even vaguely in
> >> sight.
> >> Brian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> macports-dev mailing list
> >> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
> > That answer is easy. Toby doesn't need them.
> While that is true, the main thing is that this discussion belongs elsewhere.
> This is macports-dev
> - Toby
Well it directly impacts one of your ports (regardless of how much you
detest that particular package) and all other ports like octave that depend
More information about the macports-dev