Time for 1.9

[Russell Jones]

Andrea D'Amore wrote:
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Müller <raimue at macports.org> wrote:
>   
>> The only thing for me would be 'rdeps' vs. 'deps --recursive' (or the
>> abbreviated version 'deps --r'). But I guess that only bothers me, so
>> just leave it as it is now :-)
>>     
>
> Meaning that in trunk it actually os 'rdeps' but you'd like 'deps
> --recursive', right?
>
> If I had to pick up one I'd choose rdeps because it is more handy even
> if 'deps --recursive' is more self-explicative and coherent
On a related issue, though perhaps this would cause rather than prevent 
confusion, how about calling dependencies and dependants "depcs" and 
"depts", a little like "authz" and "authn" in apache2?

Russell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20100505/ef3bc30b/attachment.html>