Time for 1.9

[Rainer Müller]

On 06.05.2010 11:42, Russell Jones wrote:
> Authorization and authentication. The thing about "deps" is that it's
> ambiguous (could be dependencies or dependants). Perhaps it should be
> expanded to dependencies in light of the facility allowing arguments
> to be the minimal unambiguous string, which I guess would make them
> depende and dependa for those who want to type the minimum.

The use of unambiguous prefixes only works for options, not for names of
actions.

But as you speak of misunderstanding, the 'r' in 'rdeps' could be  read
as 'reverse' instead of 'recursive'.

Rainer