[87705] trunk/dports/gnome/libwnck/Portfile

[Scott Webster]

FYI, the guide says: "For the best security, use md5, sha1, and rmd160
checksum types."  Presumably someone could update it if necessary.

Scott

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 16:34, devans at macports.org wrote:
>
>> Revision: 87705
>>          http://trac.macports.org/changeset/87705
>> Author:   devans at macports.org
>> Date:     2011-12-01 14:34:36 -0800 (Thu, 01 Dec 2011)
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> libwnck: update to version 2.30.7.
>
>> -checksums       md5     323127c546d4b6796ae569f3da0892ab \
>> -                sha1    a7ef8842f85249878fd0389ae6c1b303d41e9623 \
>> -                rmd160  d9c228bfe1257de9b1b1e8a3fc3b8c38d6e665d9
>> +checksums       sha256  8be84d5333f0ade0e61af9f4cbf7685cb7cce2aa0ee32f53bac32107a81fe194
>
> Remember that we do still want to list two different checksum types for each distfile. sha256 may be considered a secure algorithm today, but by using two different checksum types for each file, we ensure that if ever one of the algorithms becomes known to be insecure in the future, we won't have a problem.
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev