[87904] trunk/dports/mail/signing-party/Portfile

[Jeremy Lavergne]

> The signing-party port contains some software licensed under BSD, some
> licensed under GPL-2 and some under GPL-2 or any later version. I think
> this representation is closest to reality, as you can't just distribute
> the whole package under the terms of GPL-3 (which would be possible if I
> didn't list GPL-2 explicitly).
> So, if any correction should be made, I'd suggest removing GPL-2+,
> rather than GPL-2. Does having all three of them cause any problems?

I'd agree with your logic here: there are some pieces that can be GPL-3 but not all. And those same pieces can't be GPL-2+ (in the 2.X sense).

It would best to use just GPL-2 here unless you knew somehow (separate license file, something on their site indicated, etc) that they meant GPL-2+ and they've simply not modified all their sources files to match yet.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 8796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20111211/cd2498f4/attachment.bin>