[87904] trunk/dports/mail/signing-party/Portfile

[Clemens Lang]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 06:39:23PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Oh right, I thought you were listing "and" licenses but you were
> listing "or" licenses. No change then. I'm not aware of any problems
> listing the licenses this way.

Now that you mention it, that might have been the wrong notation. I
think I need "and" in this case:

The signing-party port contains a number of tools as follows:
	Licensed BSD: caff, gpgsigs
	Licensed GPL-2+: gpg-key2ps, gpg-mailkeys, gpgparticipants,
		keylookup, sig2dot, springgraph, gpgdir, gpgwrap
	Licensed GPL: keyanalyze
Since we (and everybody else, e.g. Debian and Ubuntu) ship these in one
package, all of the licenses apply to the package, so I guess the line
should have been
	license BSD GPL-2 GPL-2+
right?

On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:40:12 -0500, Jeremy Javergne wrote:
> It would best to use just GPL-2 here unless you knew somehow (separate
> license file, something on their site indicated, etc) that they meant
> GPL-2+ and they've simply not modified all their sources files to
> match yet.

The source is Debian's copyright file[1].

[1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/signing-party/signing-party_1.1.4-1/signing-party.copyright

-- 
Clemens Lang
GSoC Student