toby at macports.org
Fri Jan 21 16:27:07 PST 2011
On Jan 21, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:07:43PM -0800, Toby Peterson wrote:
>> On Jan 21, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Does port leave an audit trail ala yum.log? I double checked and my local port directory for pymol had revision 1
>>> so any previous builds of pymol would not have superceded the new revision 2. I also see that pymol revision bumped
>>> at r75159 on 1/16/01.
>> Since you had revision 1 locally, it sounds like you got the libpng update but missed out on the corresponding revbump in pymol. If that's the case, simply rebuilding pymol (after another selfupdate/sync) would've obviated this entire thread.
> Your argument doesn't make sense. According to...
> the revision 1 change was committed on Jan 9th, whereas according to...
> The bump to revision 2 was done automatically on Jan 16th. So my local
> revision 1 portfile should have no impact on this issue.
> ps This problem was observed with a 'port selfupdate' and 'port update outdated'
The fact that you had revision 1 locally is 100% relevant, because it indicates that your copy of the pymol Portfile was not updated as it should have been.
More information about the macports-dev