ryandesign at macports.org
Tue Jun 14 14:36:03 PDT 2011
On Jun 13, 2011, at 08:53, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2011, at 10:00 PM, Larry Gilbert wrote:
>> I've tested the upgrade many times over and I don't expect any
>> problems, but if you run into any, please let me know.
> it fails when using 'direct' mode (instead of image mode):
> DEBUG: Executing proc-pre-org.macports.activate-activate-0
> Warning: Deactivating old, pre-6.x libwww-perl to activate p5-http-date
> ---> Deactivating p5-libwww-perl
> Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: p5-libwww-perl @5.837_1 not installed as an image.
> DEBUG: Backtrace: Image error: p5-libwww-perl @5.837_1 not installed as an image.
> while executing
> "$pre $targetname"
> Warning: the following items did not execute (for p5-http-date): org.macports.activate
> Log for p5-http-date is at: /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_perl_p5-http-date/main.log
> Error: Problem while installing p5-http-date
> To report a bug, see <http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets>
> Simple workaround is to uninstall p5-libwww-perl (with force if necessary) and then install it again.
> (the problem is the pre-activate method in p5-http-date assumes image mode).
Doesn't this affect all the ports using the deactivate hack, not just p5-http-date?
More information about the macports-dev