[87256] trunk/dports/print

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Nov 15, 2011, at 14:00, Sylwester Arabas wrote:

> Dear Ryan and Takeshi,
> 
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Nov 14, 2011, at 22:45, takeshi at macports.org wrote:
>>> Revision: 87256
>>>        http://trac.macports.org/changeset/87256
>>> Author:   takeshi at macports.org
>>> Date:     2011-11-14 20:45:02 -0800 (Mon, 14 Nov 2011)
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> pslib: adding pslib
>>> 
>>> Added Paths:
>>> -----------
>>>  trunk/dports/print/pslib/
>>>  trunk/dports/print/pslib/Portfile
>>> 
>>> Added: trunk/dports/print/pslib/Portfile
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- trunk/dports/print/pslib/Portfile	                        (rev 0)
>>> +++ trunk/dports/print/pslib/Portfile	2011-11-15 04:45:02 UTC (rev 87256)
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
>>> +# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:ft=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
>>> +# $Id$
>>> +
>>> +PortSystem                  1.0
>>> +
>>> +name                        pslib
>>> +version                     0.4.5
>>> +categories                  print
>>> +maintainers                 igf.fuw.edu.pl:slayoo
>>> +license                     GPL/LGPL
>> 
>> We use a space, not a slash, between licenses. "GPL LGPL". If possible, please indicate the version of the license. I've looked through some of the source files and they all appear to be under LGPL 2 or later. I can't find any source files under the GPL license. So unless I've missed something, I'd list the license as "LGPL-2+".
> 
> I've taken the dual licensing info from the pslib website:
> http://pslib.sourceforge.net/
> "pslib is licensed under the GPL and LGPL for use in PECL."

Yes, I saw that on the web site. But can you determine which part of pslib is under the GPL?