sha1 and rmd160

[Jeremy Lavergne]

> I'm not trying to pick a scab.  Just found it curious when I was working on a portfile that both were recommended without offering any reasons why.
> 
> Hadn't thought about malicious alteration of the distfiles.  I presumed it was to detect garbled transmission.

If Ryan were awake already, he'd send you a precise link to the discussion. Just use google to search the mailing list archives to find all the discussions you could dream of :-)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 8796 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20120406/a7cd2988/attachment-0001.bin>