sha1 and rmd160

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Apr 8, 2012, at 00:49, Blair Zajac wrote:

> On 4/7/12 10:28 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>>> I don't know why we're so focused on removing md5 support.
>> 
>> We're not officially about removing md5, unless it's used alone. We're really about ensuring more than one hash is used.
> 
> Ryan seems to want to remove it :)

Perhaps at some point. A user asked if there was a date set when we were going to remove it. I said no, and outlined a set of criteria I thought should be met before we consider removing it. It will probably take years before that set of criteria is satisfied, if ever.