[91865] trunk/dports/science/netcdf-cxx/Portfile

[Eric Cronin]

On 12.04.2012 10:34, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2012-4-13 00:20 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> When the epoch gets put back in, you'll also need to update the 
>> revision.
>> epoch: 1
>> version: 4.2
>> revision: 2
>
> The bug in the registry API that necessitates that is gone in 2.1 
> BTW.
>

Wasn't there a second issue that the filenames for packages don't 
include epoch, so there is a risk of grabbing/reusing the package from a 
different epoch if the version_revision part happens to match?  Is this 
fixed as well in 2.1?  None of the packages on packages.macports.org 
have epochs in the filenames yet.

Thanks,
Eric